iINFORMATION TRAJECTORY	null	(FALSE)	0
i	null	(FALSE)	0
i2024-07-01	null	(FALSE)	0
i	null	(FALSE)	0
iHumans invented Wikipedia, which made accessing information highly-convenient,	null	(FALSE)	0
iat the risk of questions about its authenticity (I'm well aware that in many	null	(FALSE)	0
isubject areas Wikipedia routinely outranks many other sources for accuracy.	null	(FALSE)	0
iBut the point remains, because you've no idea what the bias of randomuser123	null	(FALSE)	0
iis; even if you check the sources they cite, you don't know what sources they	null	(FALSE)	0
iomitted to include. I love Wikipedia, but I can't deny its weaknesses.).	null	(FALSE)	0
i	null	(FALSE)	0
iThen humans invented GPTs, which made accessing information even	null	(FALSE)	0
imore-convenient (Sure, ChatGPT and friends aren't always more-convenient. But	null	(FALSE)	0
iif you need to summarise information from several sources, you might find them	null	(FALSE)	0
ia more-suitable tool than those which came before. Why do I feel the need to	null	(FALSE)	0
iadd so many footnotes to what should have been a throwaway comment?) at the	null	(FALSE)	0
iexpense of introducing hallucinations that can be even harder to verify and	null	(FALSE)	0
icheck.	null	(FALSE)	0
i	null	(FALSE)	0
iIs humanity's long-term plan to invent something that spews complete nonsense	null	(FALSE)	0
ithat's simultaneously impossible to conclusively deny? (Actually, now I think	null	(FALSE)	0
iabout it, I'm confident that I can name some politicians who are ahead of the	null	(FALSE)	0
imachines, for now.)	null	(FALSE)	0
i	null	(FALSE)	0
IShonky MSPaint-grade graph showing ease of access increasing as ease of verification decreases, with a trend line going through Wikipedia (2001) through ChatGPT (2022) to an unknown future in 2043.	/2024/07/access-verification-graph-wikipedia-chatgpt-2.png	danq.me	70
.